Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

The other thing about bird flu

I've pretty much been tuning out all the panicked talk about the bird-flu virus and the pandemic that's supposedly soon to be unleashed upon the world.  The doomsayers always conveniently forget to mention that to date there's no evidence that the virus has mutated into a form that can be transmitted directly from human to human; the confirmed cases and fatalities worldwide (so far as I know) have all been shown to be individuals who had contact with ... you guessed it ... birds.  And when President Bush announced that he was going to ask Congress for $7 billion in emergency funding to prepare for the crisis, and that Tamiflu stores were going to be stockpiled, well, cynical me just thought how happy he must have been to find something to get people's minds off Iraq.

So, much to my surprise, I found myself reading an Op-Ed piece in Wednesday's New York Times.  It was written by Oliver Sacks, a neurologist and the author of Awakenings, about encephalitis lethargica patients, and Joel A. Vilensky, a professor of anatomy and cell biology at the Indiana University School of Medicine.  And it scared me more than any of the bird flu talk has.  You'll find the article behind the cut.


"Waking To a New Flu Threat"

(from the Op-Ed page of The New York Times, 16 November 2005; written by Oliver Sacks and Joel A. Vilensky)

Everyone is wondering whether the bird-flu virus will mutate and cause an outbreak of influenza comparable to the 1918 pandemic, which killed more than 25 million people.  But there is an additional possibility -- that the bird flu, if it comes, may bring more than influenza.

The influenza pandemic of 1918 was followed by another epidemic.  The disease was encephalitis lethargica, or the "sleepy sickness," and like influenza, it spread through most of the world.  Its symptoms were extraordinarily varied -- most commonly there was lethargy, but sometimes there was insomnia, and even frenzy; sometimes there were paralyses, sometimes mental disorders.

It seemed at first as if a dozen different epidemics had sprung up at once, and it was only through the unifying work of a great Austrian doctor, Constantin von Economo, that all these varied symptoms were recognized to be manifestations of a single disease, the one Economo named "encephalitis lethargica."

Of the million or so people who came down with encephalitis lethargica during this period, half a million died in the acute stages of the illness; most of the survivors, people who appeared to have recovered, went on to develop, sometimes decades later, a variety of neurological problems, including a crippling form of parkinsonism.

New York was especially hard-hit by the disease, and as a result it became the world center for encephalitis vaccine trials, all of which failed.  In fact, the sickness so exercised the medical community that an estimated 9,000 articles and books were written on it from 1917 to 1939.

But after this it largely vanished from medical consciousness and popular consciousness alike -- no cure or causative agent had ever been found and most of the remaining survivors were housed in chronic-care hospitals and forgotten.

In fact, it would take several decades for the disease to become of serious interest again.  When the drug L-dopa was introduced in the late 1960's to treat "ordinary" Parkinson's disease, it was also tried with patients who had the far more severe form of post-encephalitic parkinsonism.  Many of these patients "awakened" and did spectacularly well for a while, but the effects of L-dopa then faded, and the patients returned to their trance-like states.

The relationship of encephalitis lethargica to the 1918 influenza epidemic is unclear, but we can no longer afford to remain ignorant about it.  Economo saw similarities between encephalitis lethargica and a neurological disease -- the "nona" -- whcih broke out in Italy just after that country's influenza epidemic of 1889 to 1890.  Later research has indeed suggested a recurring association, since the time of Hippocrates, between influenza epidemics and encephalitis-like diseases.  In 1982 it was shown that irregularly spaced waves of influenza-pneumonia deaths in Seattle during the early 20th century epidemic were followed approximately one year later by corresponding waves of encephalitis fatalities.

After the arrival of the influenza pandemic via ship passengers in Western Samoa in 1918, fatal cases of encephalitis were reported for several subsequent years.  In contrast, American Samoa, which is only 32 miles away, maintained a strict quarantine and avoided the 1918 influenza epidemic.  There were no encephalitis lethargica deaths there until 1926, following a later influenza epidemic.

No funds have been allocated to try to better understand this mysterious disease and its relationship to epidemic influenza.  Encephalitis lethargica is a particularly insidious disease because it is so variable; any early cases in a new outbreak would almost certainly be misdiagnosed as they were 100 years ago.

It is not unlikely that this disease will return.  Perhaps with the imminent influenza epidemic, perhaps not.  Regardless, we would do well to reawaken ourselves to what may be a formidable gathering threat.






( 10 comments — Leave a comment )
Nov. 19th, 2005 05:38 pm (UTC)
Thanks for the article.
Nov. 22nd, 2005 02:21 pm (UTC)
You're welcome.
Nov. 19th, 2005 07:11 pm (UTC)
Having been somewhat obsessed with the bird flu virus stuff for the last few months, the major concern that the doomsayers have is that the virus will mutate. Some English professor guy whose name I can't remember is the world's leading expert, and he believes that the original 1918 pandemic was also a type of bird flu, which mutated in chickens on the front lines. The mutation they're so afraid of is if the virus variates so that it can be passed from human to human, and it's expected to happen in the next 5 years.

It could kill one in two people infected. The bigger concern is if it becomes resistent to medications like tamiflu. And the MAJOR concern is if the pandemic gets into sub-Saharan Africa, where the people are so poor and uneducated there would be no stopping it. It would be genocide.

Yeah, I'm a doomsayer. But I don't think the stockpiling that's going on is unjustified. The reason the 1918 pandemic was so devastating was that nobody was prepared for it.

Nov. 22nd, 2005 02:43 pm (UTC)
Oh, I don't take issue with the fact that it's highly likely the virus will one day mutate into a form that can be transmitted human to human. What bothers me is this whole panicky sense that if it hasn't already happened it's just a matter of days until it does. The coverage just seems to lack balance, at least what I've been seeing. I saw a talk show on Sunday morning with some very heavy hitters in the health field, and even they were talking about drawing up lists so that when the pandemic arrives (not "if"), and because there won't be enough vaccine (not "in case"), we'll know what the pecking order for vaccination is. (Health care workers will be at the top of the list, which makes sense, but apparently all politicians will rank higher than children.) Maybe the Australian press is taking a more measured stance.
Nov. 20th, 2005 12:28 am (UTC)
It's really scary how the attention diseases get depend on their 'popularity' with the public.
Nov. 22nd, 2005 02:28 pm (UTC)
Very true. Notice how AIDS has pretty much dropped off the radar screen?
Dec. 11th, 2005 09:15 pm (UTC)
Except that it's on the rise again in the younger generation. Scary stuff.
Nov. 20th, 2005 12:17 pm (UTC)
I swear I just came across the term 'sleeping sickness' in an article from National Geographic (1996ish if I'm not mistaken) about the tsetse fly - *quickly searches Wikipedia* No, not the same thing.

I got my first flu shot this year for two reasons: first, I knew the nurse and she gave it to me gratis, and secondly, the only reason I let her give it to me (yes, even for free I am not too hot on needles) was she convinced me by telling me that a) if I did get sick, the shot would prevent the illness from potentially developing into a chest infection (I've had bronchitis twice and really didn't like it!) and b) if there was a bird flu outbreak, if I got sick, having had the shot would help distinguish characteristics - oh dear, there's my non-scientific mind forgetting the facts again. In short, the flu shot won't prevent a bird flu mutation infection, but will help determine more easily if one has it.

Still, my trusty science-friend (in the sense that I trust her scientific opinion on perhaps too wide a range of issues) said that truly the only thing that would spread the current bird flu to humans was, and I believe these were her words: 'chicken buggery'. At which point I nearly fell off my chair laughing and told her to go read Isherwood's Down There on a Visit, the section entitled 'Ambrose'. :-) By the way, I noticed that A Single Man wasn't on your Isherwood shelf... *highly recommends*
Nov. 22nd, 2005 02:27 pm (UTC)
If you have problems with your chest, it's probably smart to get a flu shot. I let myself get talked into having a flu shot five or six years ago (my mother was on one of her nagging kicks), and I just got tired of telling her and and my dad that I didn't see the point since I never get the flu. Head colds, yes, but never the flu. Well, of course, not until that year, post-shot. Everyone says there's no connection, but ever since then I've gone shot-less and flu-less.

And yes, sleeping sickness and the tsetse fly I knew about, but not this encephalitis thing.
Nov. 22nd, 2005 06:45 pm (UTC)
flu shots
Hi it's me, Karen's sister Celia. I lol at your comment about getting a flu shot and then getting the flu -- so rude of me, I know -- but it made me laugh because I react the same way. Last time I got a flu shot was when I was still in school and I remember being really sick afterwards. I guess we both react weird to things! Of course I can't even take Valium because it makes me nervous.

So, no flu shots for me either.

( 10 comments — Leave a comment )